Toxicity of Ayurvedic drugs - Facts you must know - Prof Dr. Shriram Savrikar M.D. (Ayu), Ph.D.
Toxicity of Ayurvedic drugs - Facts you must know
Doubts are
often found raised on the toxicity of Ayurvedic
drugs. These doubts arise out of ignorance about Ayurvedic drugs. Pessimistic
view about Ayurvedic drugs, is
specifically related to heavy metal content of Ayurvedic drugs. Many people think that most of the Ayurvedic drugs contain heavy metals.
This is not true. Not all Ayurvedic drugs
contain heavy metals or any ingredients harmful to the body.
Ayurvedic drugs can be broadly
classified into three types 1. Herbal drugs 2. Mineral or Metal drugs and 3.
Herbo-mineral or Herbo-metallic drugs. There is no reason that the first Herbal
drug category should contain any metal or mineral ingredient. If present, such
presence is indicative of adulteration of the drug. The second category named
Mineral or Metal drugs, as the name suggests do contain minerals or/and metals
as the case may be. However, this category should not contain any mineral or
metal other than its genuine ingredient. Such presence of metals or minerals in
these drugs is an adulteration. The principle applicable to mineral or metal
drug is applicable to the third category named Herbo-mineral or Herbo-metallic
drugs as well. Presence of any mineral or metal other than its genuine
ingredient makes the drug adulterated.
It is also to be known that some herbal drugs are made of poisonous
plants. The indication, dose, duration and adjuvants and other requirements of
consumption of such drugs needs to be carefully planned, which is a highly
professional job. Consumption of such herbal drugs without advice and supervision
of appropriately qualified and trained Ayurvedic
doctor
will always prove harmful. Such
uncontrolled consumption is observed to be a basic cause in almost all cases of
toxicity purported to be caused by Ayurvedic drugs, widely reported in print and virtual media world
over.
Inappropriate
use of Ayurvedic drugs:
Inappropriate use of Ayurvedic drugs
is invariably related to the dose and duration of administration. Such inappropriate
use of any drug can prove as fatal as a strong poison, and as injurious as an
injury caused by a fatal weapon or a burn, therefore every drug needs to be
used very cautiously. Even a strong poison if used appropriately proves an
effective drug, whereas even an ambrosia if used inappropriately can prove as
fatal as a strong poison. Metals and mineral ingredients are purposefully added
in many Ayurvedic medicinal
formulations to derive therapeutic benefit. In all such cases it is the
responsibility of the manufacturer to display the presence of heavy metal or
any toxic substance, in a drug as an ingredient on the label of the drug.
Failure of such declaration invites penal action on the part of manufacturer.
The dose of drugs containing
mineral metal or poisonous plants is found exceeded in almost all reported cases
of toxicity of Ayurvedic drugs. Ayurvedic classics are very specific
while stating the dose of such drugs. Mineral metal drugs better known as Rasaushadhi are known to be effective in
very small doses.
Duration
of Administration: Another very important problem is the duration for
which the mineral metal drugs are administered. In many cases, particularly in
reported cases of toxicity, the dose and duration of the drug appears to have
been exceeded far more than required. It is also observed that the incidences
of toxicity caused by Ayurvedic drugs
are blown out of proportion by most of the authors. Compared to incidences of Adverse
Drug Ractions (ADRs) resulting from administration of allopathic drugs, ADRs of
Ayurvedic drugs appear negligible.
Some researchers have
conducted analytical studies of Ayurvedic
drugs to find out their heavy metal content and toxic potential. In all
these studies the heavy metal content of Ayurvedic
drugs is found compared with permissible limits of heavy metal content in
food products. Naturally it was found higher. Comparison of drugs with food
products in all these studies is irrational and unscientific. Permissible
limits for drugs are always much higher for drugs and applicable only for
assessing the adulteration in the drugs. As compared to drugs, the food
products are consumed in large amounts and on regular basis for long durations.
Therefore, permissible limits of harmful ingredients in food products are much
lower. Consumption of such food products in large amounts and for long duration,
is likely to produce irreversible damage to the body. Whereas, drugs are taken
in very small doses and for a very short duration. Therefore, permissible limits
for drug are much higher. In case some damage is produced by consumption of
these drugs, due to their heavy metal content, such damage is reversible after
withdrawal of drugs. Moreover, when heavy metals are purposefully added in the
drug for the benefit for the patient, such limits are not applicable. In such
cases the therapeutic dose and duration of administration of drug is determined
in such a way, that no harm is produced to the body. Still many researchers
publish papers reporting heavy metal content of Ayurvedic drugs, considering them as food supplements. They should
correct themselves and consider Ayurvedic
drugs as drugs.
In some cases, Ayurvedic drugs may have been found to
have caused toxicity. Overall review of published articles reporting such toxicity
of Ayurvedic drugs indicates that in
almost all these cases, even ordinary rules of drug consumption were not
followed during administration of these drugs. The misappropriations observed occurred
in these cases can be summarized as below:
1. Drugs were found
administered in doses more than the prescribed dose.
2. Precautions regarding
adjuvants, dietary practices etc. necessary to be observed during consumption
of Ayurvedic drugs were not followed
by the consumer.
3. Duration of administration
of drugs was found exceeded much more than the prescribed period.
4. The patient consuming the
drugs were not supervised or monitored by any qualified Ayurvedic doctor.
5. Drugs were acquired by
the patients either from online market or purchased from grocery stores from
local market, without any medical advice.
To conclude, it can be definitely said that it is not wise to
manufacture, sale, prescribe and consume Ëyurevdic
drugs carelessly, thinking that they do not have any side effects. It is
also true that Ayurvedic drugs are
safe when used appropriately under the supervision of appropriately qualified
and trained Ayurvedic doctor, but can
prove harmful as any other drug does, if not used appropriately. Last but not the
least, if somebody consumes drugs as if they are food products, they are bound
to prove toxic. In such a situation it is the fault of consumer and not of the
drug.
---------------------------------X------------------------

Thank you sir for your post on this important issue and presenting it very precisely and nicely.
उत्तर द्याहटवाIs it time to classify certain Ayurvedic drugs under schedule H or schedule X ?
उत्तर द्याहटवाVery precisely presentation
उत्तर द्याहटवाThere's difference of opinion about duration and dose pl.
उत्तर द्याहटवाThere is no question of opinions. The classical description needs to be interpreted correctly and in the correct context. This issue can't be discussed in this post. The post is meant for common people.
उत्तर द्याहटवाComprehensive article about toxicity of Ayurvedic drugs. You should add Marine drugs and Animal sources drugs.
उत्तर द्याहटवा